Prosecutors Punch Back at Harvey Weinstein: your & # 39; exculpatoire & # 39; e-mails do not deny the costs of rape

Prosecutors Punch Back at Harvey Weinstein: your & # 39; exculpatoire & # 39; e-mails do not deny the costs of rape

Prosecutors of Manhattan pushed back Wednesday against the allegations of accused sexual predator Harvey Weinstein that they held exculpatory evidence of a grand jury.

The unseemly film magnate is facing accusations in Manhattan for alleged non-consensual sexual encounters with three women, including a prosecutor who has not been publicly identified.

Prosecutors' new notifications come in response to the motions submitted on 3 August by the lawyers of Weinstein, in which they plead for dismissal, arguing that exculpatory e-mails were withheld from great jurors.

The lawyers of Weinstein have argued that messages that have been exchanged with an alleged victim over the course of a four-year period clash with her accusation that he raped her in March 2013.

"For example on 8 February 2017, [the accuser] e-mailed Mr. Weinstein say, "I love you, always do, but I hate to feel like an outside visit. :), & # 39;" his lawyers had claimed that the woman wrote.

"These e-mails, we confirm, confirm the very relevant fact that the relationship between [the accuser] and Mr. Weinstein was both consensual and intimate; More importantly, certain e-mails sent to Mr. Weinstein by [the accuser] can reasonably be understood as a reflection [her] the intention that she wanted the relationship to go deeper ", they kept in their file last month.

The Manhattan District Attorney & # 39; s Office argues that if the court revised the minutes of the grand jury, it would be clear that "the grand jury had been properly instructed on the law and that the integrity of the proceedings was unaffected, and the people all accusations deny the opposite … "

"The defendant's first argument to dismiss is his claim that the Prosecution had the obligation to present to the Grand Jury various e-mail exchanges between the defendant and the victim of certain accusations," wrote prosecutors in judicial documents. "The defendant does not claim, because he can not, that one of the e-mails contains a denial of the loaded rape."

"Instead, the defendant claims that at most the e-mails could indicate a state of mind that does not match what the defendant thinks should be a victim of rape," state prosecutors continue. "The most important thing is that an overview of the minutes of the big jury in this case will reveal that the people have presented honest evidence and in a way that was not misleading by giving a full and honest account of the relationship between the suspect and the victim both before and after the loaded rape. "


Post Comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.