GROWING LOCAL TALENTS AND BEING NEW TALENT BY DOMESTIC MIGRATION
POPULATION, MIGRATION AND GROWTH TRENDS IN THE USA.
INDIANA POPULATION & MIGRATION
Benefited from a decline in net domestic out-migration, Indiana's population growth 2017 was the best
since 2008. Driven by a declining birth rate and an aging population, Indiana's population growth has been
however, under the last decade according to the latest population estimates by the Census Bureau.
Given the industrial and national composition of the state, it is not surprising to see the majority of the growth
currently driven by selected metropolises – notably Indianapolis – and with a large inequality of growth
With 6.7 million Hoosiers, Indiana was the 17th most populous country in 2017.
The 32,800 resident increase ranked Indiana as the 19 th fastest growing state in 2017 on a numerical level
base and 25th based on the growth rate of 0.5%.
The increase of 176,800 residents ranked Indiana as the 20th fastest growing state in the period 2010-2017
period on a numerical basis and 31 st on the basis of the growth rate of 2.7%.
Indiana's net domestic out migration at state level was -916 in 2017, an improvement compared to -10,480 in 2016
and -14,675 in 2015. The net domestic out migration in 2017 resulted in a 26-second national ranking
the -54,800 net domestic out migration for the period 2011-2017 resulted in a ranking of 36 th
Although it is not generally a primary driver of economic health, international immigration is still important.
After having realized the positive international migration of 70,900, Indiana's total net immigration was positive
16,100 over the period 2011-2017, ranking of the state 32 e. Without the academic fuel
international migration, the net migration of the state would not have been positive.
As a barometer of economic growth, community health and desirability, the population is changing
Applicable to net domestic migration is a very important dynamic. Although she might be the
Migration angle, state and local officials may consider considering more results-based strategies
local jobs, develop local talent and attract skilled talent through domestic migration rather than being restrictive
their focus on new business location activities.
The same applies to talent conservation, community visibility, imagery and helping communities to distinguish
himself. While the state has done a great job positioning for new location-based companies, based on what the state has to offer, Indiana has the opportunity to reverse their net domestic outsourcing.
migration, but it has not happened yet. The positive net migration experienced by a number of Indiana's
metro areas is the result of in-state migration, not migration from outside the state. Other Midwest
cities with a growing population and good economies are experiencing the same.
Full employment is not a growth path for growing companies. For more information about the use of humans
capital, including prioritizing jobs in their own country, developing local talent, the efficient use of tax resources
and strategies for improving net domestic migration, see the relevant sections in this release.
Although it is not yet recognized, the migration patterns of the nation are changing. As a result, the
potential to attract individual talent, attract new customers and grow the population via net domestic
migration should not be underestimated.
As you can see, Indiana's net domestic out migration loss of -54,800 in the period 2011-2017
sharp contrast to the 1, 015,000, 916,000, 307,000, 275.00 and 270,000 net domestic migration
gains made by Florida, Texas, N. Carolina, Arizona and Colorado in the same period.
Emphasizing the importance of net domestic migration, ALEC & # 39; s 11 th edition of Rich States, Poor States
awarded Indiana a high # 3 rating on their future-oriented Economic Outlook Rankings and a low # 39
listing on their retrospective Economic Performance Rankings.
Although some question the methodology, the poor hierarchy for economic performance was primarily due
to the net domestic out migration of the state. The right to work and tax benefits were in the first place
responsible for the high economic outlook.
INDIANA METRO COMMUNITIES: Indianapolis on a Roll
Benefiting from improved net domestic migration, more than half of the state's metros, i.e. 21 out of 36,
has built up a population in 2017 and achieved 17 in the period 2010-2017. The 21 metro reinforcement
population rose in 2017 from 18 in 2016 and 15 in 2017.
Indiana has ten metroparks with a population of more than 100,000 and six with more than 200,000 inhabitants. With a population of
2,029,000, the Indianapolis subway was the largest in the state and the nation's 34th largest subway
2017. The other major urban areas of the state include Ft. Wayne (435,000), South Bend (322,000), Evansville
(316,000), Lafayette (219,000) and Elkhart (205,000).
The 23,000 numerical increase by Indianapolis dominated all other Indiana subways in 2017. On a numeric
base, Indianapolis was the nation's 27th fastest growing subway in 2017. The 136,000 increase is ranked
Indianapolis as the 29th fastest growing metro in the country in the period 2010 – 2017.
Based on a percentage growth, Lafayette (8.5%), Indianapolis (7.2%), Columbus (6.8%) and Bloomington
(4.8%) were the fastest growing major metro systems in the period 2010 – 2017. Of the ten fastest growing
metro & # 39; s, only five were among the largest.
The forward-looking report & # 39; Area Development & # 39; over the Leading Metro Locations in 2018 the
growth in California, the lifestyle-driven Pacific Northwest and the mountain states. Although not yet
confirmed by the backward Census Bureau data, they also noticed growth outliers in the
monolithic Midwest, such as Elkhart-Goshen and Columbus.
Known for architecture, art, beautification, regional low unemployment and a high average wage percentage,
Columbus is another metro with potential. Area development also mentioned their revitalization, tax
incentives, law enforcement and perhaps most importantly, the ability to attract skilled labor.
Based on the growth of 7.2% percent, Indianapolis was ranked 22nd in the fastest growing subway of the United States
more than 2,000,000 during the period of 2010-2017 and 29 of more than 1,000,000. Lead the group
and adding 388,000 residents, Austin's relatively grown with a 22.5% rate over 2010-2017
While half of the metroprovincie of the state grew in 2017 and only during the period 2010-2017
seven members benefited from net domestic migration in 2017, while three benefited in the period 2011-2017
period. In contrast to the data at national level, the data from the metro and the province of the Census Bureau are not
breakthroughs interstate and intrastate migration.
Obtaining 7,800 in 2017 and 30,400 in the period 2011-2017, the Indianapolis subway was by far the
primary beneficiary of the net domestic migration. Indianapolis was also the only & # 39; big & # 39; metro of the state
benefit from the net domestic migration over the period 2011-2017.
While the eleven Indianapolis-Carmel-Anderson subway was only responsible for 30% of the state
population, the Indianapolis metro was responsible for 70% of the state's population growth in 2017
and 77% over the period 2010-2017.
INDIANA PROVINCES: Hamilton County Strutting as a showgirl
More than half, i.e. 55 of 92, of the provinces of the state won the population in 2017 while only 33 came over
the period 2010 – 2017. The 55 cutbacks in the population in 2017 were higher than 45 in 2016 and 36 in
While 38 of the 92 Indiana counties in 2017 benefited from net domestic migration, only 10
benefited from a meaningful net domestic migration in the period 2011-2017. The 38 province profits
in the net domestic migration in 2017 there was an increase of 22 in 2016 and 19 in 2015.
Indiana has 17 districts with a population of more than 100,000 and 6 with more than 200,000 inhabitants. With a population of 944,034
and 485,640, Marion and Lake are the largest. Other large counties are Allen (372,877), Hamilton
(323,747), St. Joseph (270,434) and Elkhart (204,146).
Both in 2017 and in the period 2010-2017 were Indianapolis donut counties from Hamilton (17.1%), Boone
(15.8%), Hendricks (12.2%), Johnson (9.7%) and Hancock (6.8%) were among the fastest growing. The
donut counties also dominated net domestic in-migration gains for both periods.
Other fast-growing provinces outside the Indianapolis metro area over the period 2010-2017 were included
Tippecanoe (10.1%), Bartholomeus (6.8%) Monroe (6.1%) and Clark (5.8%).
With 324,000 inhabitants, Hamilton County is the fourth largest county in the state. Hamilton is also the fastest
growing province in the Indianapolis and state metropolitan area. Hamilton & # 39; s 17.1% growth rate
2010 – 2017 was fueled by the growing populations in the luxury suburbs of cities Fishers and Carmel.
If we look at the 225 largest provinces of the nation with a population of more than 300,000 inhabitants, the 17.1% growth of Hamilton
rate over the period 2010 – 2017 ranked the 16th province. If we look at the 15 counties that best suit Hamilton,
six were in Texas and four were in Florida. Virginia, S. Carolina, Tennessee, Colorado and N. Carolina
each had one in the top fifteen. As noted, the migration patterns in Texas and Florida change.
Marion is the largest county in the state and the Indianapolis metro area. While Marion County won
6,048 residents in 2017, it also experienced a net domestic outflow of -3,527 in 2017 and -21,243
over the period 2011-2017. Followed by Lake County, the net household out-migration of Marion was greater
than all other provinces in Indiana for both periods.
CITIES: Westfield, Fishers & Carmel Leapfrogging Ahead
Indiana has ten cities with a population of more than 70,000. Seven of the ten largest cities knew the population
2017 and the period 2010-2017.
The cities ranged from Indianapolis (863,000) and Ft. Wayne (266,000) at the top to Lafayette (72,390),
the tenth largest. Carmel (92.198) was in 5th place and Fishers (91.832) was in sixth place behind. Compared
for the rest of the nation, Indianapolis was the 16th largest city, while Ft. Wayne was 78th.
With growth of the growth package among the largest cities, the fisherman population grew by 2.1% in 2017
Carmel grew by 1.5%. Increasing with respectively 18% and 15.6% were Fishers and Carmel by far
The fastest growing large cities of Indiana in the period 2010 – 2017, measured as a percentage of growth.
On a numerical basis, the profit of 41,529 Indianapolis led in the period from 2010 – 2017. Fishers
was 2 nd with an increase of 14,030 and Carmel was 3 th with an increase of 12,431 compared to the same
Fishers and Carmel both contribute to the growth of Hamilton County, the fourth largest province in the state.
Hamilton rose by 47,271 and was the fastest growing Indiana County on a numerical and percentage scale
growth dependency over the period 2010-2017.
Given that people do not live in states, metro & # 39; s or provinces, but in cities, towns and villages, let's take
a more detailed picture. If we go to Indiana with a population of more than 25,000, Westfield (39.5),
Plainfield (32.9), Noblesville (61.9), Zionsville (26.7) and Brownsburg (25.9) surpassed all fishermen 2.1%
growth in 2017, while everything except Zionsville outpaced the 18% growth of Fishers over the period 2010-2017.
With a population of 39,500 Westfield dominated the population growth of cities of more than 25,000
in 2017 (5.3%) and in the period 2010 – 2017 (30.7%). All five of these fast-growing cities were in the
DEMOGRAPHIC OUTLOOK UP TO 2050: Growth driven by a handful of metro & # 39; s, while 65% of the
Fueled by a small number of metropolises, the population of Indiana will continue to grow, but on one
slower pace compared to previous decades.
Based on recent projections from the Indiana Business Research Center (IBRC), the population of the state
will rise from 6.67 million in 2017 to 7.27 in 2050. The 600,000 increase in population reflects a growth of 9%
The 11 district of the Indianapolis province will continue as the main population source of the state
The population of Indianapolis Metro is expected to grow to 2.51 million by 2050, an increase of 24% over
2017 2.03 million. As the area adds 500,000 inhabitants, the share of state population will increase to 35%.
Hamilton County will lead the growth of Metro in Indianapolis – and the state – with an increase of 200,000+,
up 63% from 2017. Hamilton will undoubtedly surpass Allen and Lake County to become the state
the second largest province by 2050. The other donut-counties, Boone, Hendricks, Johnson and Hancock
is expected to increase by a third.
The two largest provinces, Marion and Allen, are expected to increase by 14% and 18% respectively.
Looking at the 12 largest provinces of the state, Lake is the only major province that is expected to die off.
Looking beyond Central Indiana, Tippecanoe, Daviess, Monroe, Clark, Elkhart and Switzerland are others
provinces are expected to grow by 20% until 2050.
Over the past two years, 55 provinces have taken the population in 2017, while 33 have risen more than in 2010
– 2017 period. Negative for the three-year trend, the IBRC projects that only 33 provinces will experience
population growth up to and including 2050. In other words, 59 districts – representing 65% of the total
predicted to lose the population until 2050.
As you can see, the slow growth of the state will continue, but there will be a great inequality between the
provinces. Indeed, the growth between a small number of metropolises and the decline of a large one
number of medium-sized and rural communities is somewhat daunting.
The 65+ older population will increase from the current 15% of the total state population to almost 21% in 2035.
Given the flat birth rate and the rising mortality rate, the natural increase in the state will decrease. Based on the
IBRC projections, population outside the metropolises for medium-sized provinces, are expected to decrease by 6%
while rural communities will decrease by 9%.
Because most forecasts are based on the natural increase / decrease, the net domestic migration
DEMIS OF THE AMERICAN / INDIANA FARMER
The American farmer has been losing his export market share for decades. The farm problem goes much further
the current trade war, the Chinese who stimulate competitors, the decreasing agricultural income and the enormous decline
export of agricultural products and prices in July.
Exchange rate fluctuations, cheap and available land, a longer growing season, farm-friendly government
policies and huge infrastructural investments have all played a role. While the Russians and Brazilians
heavily invested in their export infrastructure, farmers from Midwest are confronted with a broken down sluice and dam
system that measures reliability.
In short, once in the break of the world, the American farmer is now struggling for a place at the table. Given
that this dynamic will not be reversed, it is time for policymakers of the state to step up and develop
other sources of growth and employment for the farming community. The new NAFTA deal is positive,
but subsidies, crutches and a Soviet-type economy are no solution.
Unfortunately, the decline in the predictions of the declining number of rural communities by the IBRC would leave something to be desired. The
impact of trade / tariff war – including retaliation – on the Indiana economy and employment
unknown, but the damage can be meaningful. In addition to the impact on agriculture, this can also have consequences
jobs that use imported steel. Indiana employs more than 20 percent of steel workers in the United States and
has the largest number of jobs with imported steel.
As you can see, Indiana needs successful growth strategies outside the big metropolises.
Fortunately, many government officials can determine their own course. To discover how Indiana could
change the differences in district, see Improvement of net domestic migration.
The full report will discuss them in detail, but one of the strategies involves using the out migration
of multi-level, disabled Illinois tax-related Illinois, natural and neighboring market. Texas was
very successful in targeting high tax, high regulation and anti-business states. Given the favorable tax,
regulation, costs and infrastructural environment, there is no reason why Indiana can not do the same.
Although the & # 39; Illinoyed & # 39; – and & # 39; Illinoying & # 39; campaigns were logical, Indiana has not yet committed to the
individual level re net domestic migration, i.e. the bottom line. Lower taxes, less expensive employees
compensation and lower costs for doing business are great, but real success lies in convincing professionals
Labor Indiana is a good place to live.
Individuals, i.e. age, income, education & needs, travel for different reasons, but jobs, housing and
family generally leads relocation within the state. Based on the ASC data from 2016, 801,000 inhabitants have moved
internally in the state of Indiana in 2016 while the gross migration of other states amounted to 146,000.
As the largest source of domestic migration within the state, 29,900 residents from Illinois went to Indiana
a gross basis in 2016.
Although not related to the farming community, Illinois students have increasingly opted for higher education
in other states. Alarmed by the budgetary stalemate, the rising costs were too worrying. The States
reputation too expensive prevented much from even applying. These students focus,
including continuous interface to keep them is another strategy that Indiana should pursue.
Based on their most recent Corruption in Illinois report, the UIC ranked Chicago as the most corrupt nation
city and Illinois as the third most corrupt state. Given the decades of corruption and poor tax policy
management, Illinois and Chicago are a simmering pot of conflicting dynamics. However, as validated
through the construction cranes and the Site Selection Magazine, the Chicago Loop in the inner city, the West Loop and
River North is one of the most dynamic metroparks in the United States. The economic vibrancy and location too
Chicago helps to realize major business investments.
The fiscal health of public pension plans varies by state, plan and year. Data about these plans also differ
Based on the 2017 Unaccountable & Unaffordable report from ALEC, Indiana was ranked as the second
healthiest state in terms of pension liabilities per capita. Connecticut, Illinois and New Jersey
ranked among the least healthy, three states that lose a significant population to net
Although more difficult to estimate than unfunded pension obligations, Other post-employment benefits
liabilities (health care) are often seen as the elephant in the room. In addition to their rankings of the
unfunded state pension obligations, the ALEC ranking of Indiana's OPED obligations was one of the most
favorable. The disclosure of the state was also designated as superior.
Looking beyond unfulfilled obligations, determining the true health of a state's tax situation is a difficult matter
task. Furthermore, a supplement to the seemingly healthy status of the state's non-financed pension and
health care obligations, the Mercatus Center ranked 16th Indiana for general fiscal health.
Although they are not predictable, economic cycles are a reality. Based on stress tests from the states by Moody's
Analytics, Indiana, is considered one of the most prepared states for the next economic center.
Indiana bond assessments by the leading services, including Standard & Poor & # 39; s, Moody & # 39; s and Fitch, are
In addition to the growing outside migration fueled by poor fiscal health, the SALT tax deductions are topped off
will further increase migration of tax-poor high-tax states such as NY, CA, CT, NJ & IL.
In the future, taxpayers in states with a low tax, such as Indiana, will no longer be richer residents
high tax states such as Illinois (32 percent increase in the personal income tax last year). Rather than
try to decorate the system with workarounds and constantly raise taxes to finance their 7,000
various government units, trade union officials and public pension promises that can not be met, IL and others
high taxation states would be wise to deal with their core problems.
Government and local authorities exist to provide services, not to tax their residents in economic slavery and
involuntary service. Require an increasingly smaller tax base to continually pay more for fewer services,
failing policies and benefits that they do not receive personally are not a sustainable path. However, it is one
The states lost the most to net domestic out-migration between in the period 2011 – 2017
NY -1,000,000, IL-630,000, CA-536,000 and NJ -387,000. In the future, fiscal health, taxes and
environmental issues are destined to play a much larger role in location decisions. Given their tax
stability and predictability, Indiana could capture an increasing part of the migration to the right
strategies at individual level.
Similar to the endless series of articles / lists about the best places to live or retire, the state-owned company
the rankings of the surroundings are on the map. Indeed, some credibility of tensions, including WalletHub's
ranking of California as the 2nd best business environment.
USA Today, US News, WalletHub, Chief Executive, CNBC and Area Development are some of the sources
that rank order business environments. As you might guess, their methodologies are quite different,
assuming that they provide information that explains them. With every preference for Indiana, Forbes, Site Selection
Magazine, Business Facilities Magazine, Pollina Real Estate and Area Development also offer business
CNBC and Chief Executive seem to be the source states that camp the most and while we like the CNBC
methodology, the Chief Executive comes closest to mirroring the net domestic migration. In our minds,
net domestic migration is the best overall barometer for health and community desirability.
Chief Executive uses a survey-based approach focused on three areas, taxes and regulations, and staff
Quality and living environment. The CNBC method, on the other hand, uses 64 measures in 10 categories. In
in other words, they claim to measure actual performance.
While WalletHub, CNBC and Chief Executive were all at No. 1 in Texas, that's where the deal ends.
Indiana's general ranking was 33rd, 16th and 5th respectively. Florida was ranked sixth, tenth and second
N. Carolina was ranked as 12, 3 and 9. Texas, Florida and N. Carolina are the countries that benefit most
of net domestic migration.
Indiana took a deeper dive into the analysis of the CNBC and was high in the infrastructure, the cost of
doing business, business friendly and cost of living categories. Indiana's quality of life, however, was
ranked near the bottom, while their education level was below average. The opinion of Chief Executive about the liveability of Indiana was more positive. They also emphasized the Indiana company
friendly environment, tax rates, regulations, growing workforce and affordability in their five states
In summary, some of the business ranking services can be useful and provide a good background
information. However, we would not consider it a gospel, because rankings may not translate to new ones
The economy is characterized by mobile capital and labor. Taxes are important, but still only one
changeable in the decision-making process. Nevertheless, states with the most attractive tax systems are the best
positioned to generate new activities, stimulate economic growth and employment. Unlike other structural ones
initiatives, changes to the tax code can have an immediate impact.
Despite globalization, the toughest competition often stems from other states instead of others
Nations. As a result, government officials have to worry about how their states relate to the
competition, including the adjacent business environment and other states. Tax competition is unpleasant
reality for budget officials, but it is an effective limitation of state and local taxes. When a state imposes
higher taxes than a neighboring state, it also encourages companies to move.
Although state officials are aware of the tax environment of their company, they sometimes get tempted to lure
do business with lucrative tax incentives and subsidies instead of broad tax reforms. Based on
numerous examples, this can be a dangerous proposition. In other words, creating long-term jobs and
economic development is best served by the tax climate for businesses rather than incentives.
To compare the states and determine their overall ranking, the Tax Foundation Index uses more than one index
100 variables in five main tax areas, including corporate taxes, individual income taxes, sales
taxes, unemployment tax and property taxes. The methodology results in a total score
then can be compared with other states.
Based on the 2018 State Business Tax Climate Index, as drawn up by the Tax Foundation, the most
Competitive states are Wyoming, S. Dakota, Alaska, Florida, Nevada, Montana, New Hampshire, Utah,
Indiana and Oregon. The least competitive are New Jersey, New York, California, Vermont, Minnesota,
Ohio, Connecticut, Maryland, Louisiana and Rhode Island.
The table below compares Indiana's overall ranking of 9 with only neighboring states. A ranking of 1 is
the best while 50 is the worst.
Individual unemployment in income
Total corporation tax Tax sales tax Property tax
Michigan 12 8 14 11 48 21
Illinois 29 36 16 35 42 45
Kentucky 33 27 29 14 47 36
Georgia 36 10 42 28 38 23
Wisconsin 38 29 43 7 40 26
Iowa 40 48 33 19 34 39 Look at the general tax arrangement of the tax foundation, note the states with the highest
Taxes, NJ, NY and CA, are also the states that lose most populations to net domestic outside-migration.
Based on data from ALEC and Mercatus, two of the states with the highest taxes, NJ and CT, are also
saddled with the worst fiscal health and unfunded pension obligations. On their value, IL currently has one
flat tax rate and while the state does not have the highest taxes, the land of Lincoln has the land
worst tax health. IL also bleeds the net household out migration.
Apart from being the third largest loser in the net household out migration of 2010-2017, IL was the only one
densely populated state to lose the population in 2017. At the level of the city, Chicago was the only city with one
population of more than 700,000 to lose the population in 2017. The population declined in the province and the metro
For those looking for evidence that high taxes and poor fiscal health have a meaningful impact
residents vote with their feet, these data validate the observation.
Highest Taxes Worst Fiscal Health Domestic Out-Migration
New Jersey (1) Illinois (1) New York (1)
New York (2) New Jersey (2) Illinois (2)
California (3) Connecticut (3) California (3)
Connecticut (7) New Jersey (4)
MIDWEST / INDIANA GROWS OUTLOOK
HOUSING AVAILABILITY & AFFORDABILITY
USE LOADING SOURCES EFFECTIVELY
PRIORITIZING HOME GROWN JOBS
LOCAL TALENT DEVELOP AND STORE
IMPROVEMENT OF NET DOMESTIC MIGRATION
CHANGE TO THE DIFFERENCE OF SMALL AND RENTAL COMMUNITIES
INCREASED VISION, IMAGE ENHANCEMENT & COMMUNITY MARKETING
US AND INDIANA DEMOGRAPHIC / MIGRATION TABLES
In addition to the population and growth, the tables relate to domestic migration in the state, the metro, the province
ABOUT DATA ANALYSIS ILLINOIS
Access to reliable, relevant and usable data has become increasingly important for the decision making of individuals and
companies, especially when the economy and / or demographics are changing. However, data can be overwhelming.
In collaboration with ProximityOne, Data Analytics from Illinois is developing an interactive Data Analytics Center website
reorganizes, integrates and provides access to the public domain and other valuable private data on a detailed basis.
ProximityOne has extensive experience in providing solutions for access to and analysis of federal geographic, federal, multi-sourcing,
demografische, economische en zakelijke gegevens. Naast geodemografische expertise hebben ze digitale kaartdatabases ontwikkeld,
GIS-software, webgebaseerde interactieve tabellen / gegevens en demografisch-economische projecties. Het personeel van Data Analytics heeft er drie
tientallen jaren ervaring met het verstrekken van concurrerende informatie aan de financiële-dienstensector, waaronder de grootste banken,
verzekeringsmaatschappijen, beleggingsfondsen, trustkantoren, beursvennootschappen en pensioenbewaarders.
Door het koppelen van georganiseerde en relevante geografische, demografische en economische gegevens, waaronder het Census Bureau,
Bureau of Labor Statistics & Bureau of Economic Analysis – onze Geostatistische gegevens zijn beter toegankelijk en bruikbaar dan de gegevens
vrijgegeven door het Census Bureau en andere federale agentschappen.
Om goed geïnformeerde besluitvorming mogelijk te maken en gebruikers in staat te stellen, zal de nieuwe, unieke en onderscheidende resource projecties bevatten
en privégegevens. De projecties omvatten Census Tract Demographic / Economic Estimates & Projections. County-up schattingen
en projecties zijn ook beschikbaar.
De betaalbaarheid van huizen en de kosten van levensonderhoud zijn sleutelvariabelen voor alle Amerikanen, inclusief diegenen die overwegen om te verhuizen. Terwijl we
gebruik de brede FHFA Home Price Index (HPI) van het publieke domein en de BLS CPI, we kunnen ook putten uit de volkstellingen en de
Net als bij de betaalbaarheid van een woning, is werkgelegenheid op regionaal en klein gebied belangrijk voor huishoudens, bedrijven en beleidsmakers.
Het Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) geeft maandelijks op nationaal en regionaal niveau gegevens vrij over jobopeningen en arbeidsomzet,
maar levert geen schattingen van de staat of substaat op. Om gebruikers nog beter in staat te stellen, is ProximityOne al aan het ontwikkelen
experimentele projecties door staat, metro en provincie. Verwacht wordt dat de BEA ooit haar eerste schattingen van het BBP van het BNP zal afgeven
in het jaar, een andere variabele die we willen integreren.
Anderen hebben zeker gegevens opnieuw verpakt, maar Data Analytics IL is de enige website die demografische gegevens koppelt,
geografische, economische en privégegevens – inclusief klantengegevens – die relevant, betrouwbaar, bijgewerkt, handig, georganiseerd zijn,
In de toekomst zullen nieuwe variabelen een belangrijke rol spelen in de binnenlandse migratie. De impact op de huizenmarkt en lokaal
de economieën zullen aanzienlijk zijn, inclusief de opkomst van nieuwe, toonaangevende metros en de ondergang van anderen. Met nadruk op
de toekomstige, hoogwaardige gegevens en projecties ongeëvenaard, zal ons vooruitblikkende commentaar daar voor de dag zijn
De geïntegreerde gegevens zullen inzicht geven in waar mensen naartoe verhuizen, wie (leeftijd, inkomen en opleiding) in beweging is, waarom ze zijn
bewegende, geprojecteerde veranderingen en de impact van die veranderingen. De korrelige component is vooral belangrijk omdat het
intrastate en interstate voorwaarden, variabelen en vooruitzichten variëren dramatisch per locatie. Het goud zit in de korreligheid omdat
bewoners wonen niet echt in staten of zelfs in metrostations, maar in graafschappen, steden, steden en buurten.
Deze informatie is afkomstig van bronnen die als betrouwbaar worden beschouwd, maar nauwkeurigheid en volledigheid kunnen niet worden gegarandeerd. All
rechten voorbehouden. Geen enkel deel van deze publicatie mag worden gereproduceerd of verspreid zonder de voorafgaande toestemming van de uitgever.
© 2018 Data Analytics Illinois, Inc.
Data Analytics Illinois, Inc.
Western Springs, IL 60558