The fatal mistake that damned the Oslo Accords

The fatal mistake that damned the Oslo Accords

During the interim years of the Oslo Accords, the Israeli settlement activity was allowed to continue unhindered, with the number of settlers increasing from 110,000 on the eve of the 1993 agreements to 185,000 in 2000, during the final status negotiations, to 430,000 today. This increase seriously undermined the idea that Israel was sincere to make way for a Palestinian state in the West Bank and Gaza.

Meanwhile, Palestinian leaders have continued to strive for what they called the "Right to Return", demanding that ever-increasing numbers of Palestinians settle in the territory of before 1967 Israel, making the Jews a minority in an Arab country. Nearly 3 million Palestinians were registered with UNRWA as refugees in 1993, a number that rose to 3.8 million in 2000 and today stands at 5.3 million. Palestinian leaders never dared to confront their people to tell them that as part of a final peace agreement, just as Jews are expected to leave their settlements east of pre-1967 rules, Arab Palestinians are expected to renounce their claim to settle west of those settlements. lines. Like settlements, it undermined the idea that Arab Palestinians had finally made peace with the presence of a sovereign Jewish people in any part of the country. These two major obstacles to peace – the Israeli settlements and the right to return – each representing a form of territorial maximalism and the ideological denial of the other's right to self-determination in the country, were growing under the umbrella of constructive ambiguity .

Jerusalem too fell prey to destructive ambiguity. Israeli leaders continued to continue the lie of a "united Jerusalem", failed to prepare the Israelis for the necessary division of Jerusalem into an Israeli capital and a Palestinian, and the Palestinian leaders extended their decades. long rejection of the idea that Jews have any historical, cultural, national or religious connection with Jerusalem.

Twenty-five years after that hopeful Oslo moment, it is not necessary to rediscover the final goal, but we need a new path to get there. The two-state solution remains the only option that recognizes the national rights of both peoples and each offers a degree of justice. Whatever party thinks about the fabricated nature of the other, both parties can agree that they deserve to live in a state where they can control their own destiny.


Post Comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.